|
Let me clearly state that I believe that true photographic evidence is much
harder to come by than many people in this field would have you to
believe.
I believe that ghosts and spirits (if there is a difference) move in and
out of our plain of existence quickly. Even when they are there, the chances
of you snapping your photo at the right instant is pretty slim.
I do not present photos containing motion blurs or any photo containing questionable
effects caused by misuse of the equipment as evidence. If I cannot solidly define in one
way or another what is in a photo, it is not evidence to me. Some photos do
get posted here just because I like them though.
I also try particularly hard to "debunk" my own photos. I joined
a paranormal networking site a while back and at first, I thought I had found
my true community. I found many of the members to be excruciatingly hard on
any evidence presented which is the way I think it should be.
But alas, as some of the "true believers" and "experts"
became more vocal I felt more and more photos were being presented and
accepted as evidence that were in fact products of motion blur1,
poor quality cameras2, excessive "enhancement"3,
and "matrixing" to the point of fantasy4.
Fortunately, I did manage to find a few kindred souls who reinforced my
belief in high standards for evidence. I hope to learn more from them.
I will post both the good and bad. Some of it is an exercise in debunking.
Some of it is just for fun. All of it will be real.
|